Skip to main content

"I Can't Go On. I'll Go On"


Contemporary art allows us to get under each other's skin. 

Through often thought provoking work, it encourages us the viewer to think more deeply about critical issues, and sometimes just pisses us off.

In the permanent collection of artist-run Chiostro del Bramante gallery here in Rome is a work by Chilean artist Alfredo Jaar: "I Can't Go On. I'll Go On". The large neon work is just around a corner and confronts the viewer as they make their turn with what the gallery describes as "colourful and unexpected visual checkpoints, creating multiple levels of reading of space...in dialogue with the viewer".

Moving into our last week of the Ecumenical and Interfaith Dialogue class, this art-work seems like a good lens to reflect on classroom presentations particularly on the 'why' portion of dialogue. For me, this class has been a fantastic experience and I will exit it with so much to reflect on as I continue my studies at Regis/St.Mike's, especially having met so many wonderful people.

The importance of Ecumenical and Interfaith Dialogue (especially the Interfaith part) for me is clear, as I choose to be a graduate student in Spirituality and the Arts at a Catholic College to deepen my own understanding of spiritual practice within the Catholic faith, a tradition which informed much of western art for millennia. I am therefore a willing participant in dialogue because of my own specific research and art-practice interests, but mostly because I like hearing other people's stories. 

It's a curious thing for myself and older family I love, as we've gotten older we have become much less interested in our own voices and much more in the voices of others. Interpersonal conversations and dialogue is the key, with person-to-person conversation becoming an important part of listening and discovering. 

But what about big dialogues? Dialogues which move beyond ourselves and simple one-on-one conversations and are tiered up to large conversations between organized religions?

From a Jewish perspective "I can't go on - I must go on" echos memories of past problems between Christians and Jews ('I can't go on with this conversation' because of our history) but the reality is Jews 'must go on with the conversation' because we have no other option: self preservation demands we show up to the table. 

I'm not being critical of the Church's motivation in dialogue, but history and the contemporary world demand a healthy skepticism. Fingers-crossed dialogue will continue to foster deepening trust and friendship, but regardless Jews have no other options: 'we must go on with the dialogue'. Our future depends on it.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Parting ways

Our last dinner with the University of Toronto group was truly memorable. Overall, the Rome trip wa a great experience and I learned a lot about ecumenism, something I had no experience with before. The concept of ecumenism as a dialogue, where one can be "strong in their identity yet open to dialogue", really resonated with  It's inspiring to see how such an approach can foster understanding and unity, even with our own "small group" from Toronto, there was so much diversity (again, it included an Anglican priest, a secular Jew, and 3 Catholics). Yet, despite our differences, there will always be a way to talk and talk to each other, if they share space with each other. I will truly miss this group , and the larger group at the Centro Pro Unione. I am looking forward to more enlightening conversations and shared ecumenical experiences in the future!  Very grateful again to Dr. Attridge, Dr. Skira and the RSM management for this wonderful opportunity! Until next...

Walking on Holy Land

Basilica di Santa Clemente (Matteo Carboni) The other day I visited Basilica Di Santa Clemente al Laterano. Santa Clemente is an 11th century church built on top of a 4th century church named after St. Clement of Rome who was the Pope between 88 and 99 CE. It is likely that the site had been used as a house church since the 2nd century CE, then transformed into a large church complex in the 4th century. Beside the 4th century church there was a temple of Mithras that had been used since the 2nd century CE. Underneath the church and the temple, excavators found Roman households destroyed by the fire of Nero in 64 CE.  I think Santa Clemente is one of the coolest sites I have visited in Rome. It has been a neighborhood church for nearly 2000 years and has only needed one upgrade!  The physical relationship between the two churches has given me much to ponder. The foundations of the 4th century church was used as a blueprint for the 11th century church. One the one hand, this is ...

Interpretations: The Jewish Ghetto or Quarter

Jewish Quarter: History The  Roman Ghetto  or  Ghetto of Rome  ( Italian :  Ghetto di Roma ) was a  Jewish ghetto established in 1555 in the  Rione Sant'Angelo , in  Rome ,  Italy , in the area surrounded by present-day Via del  Portico d'Ottavia ,  Lungotevere dei Cenci , Via del Progresso and Via di Santa Maria del Pianto, close to the River  Tiber  and the  Theatre of Marcellus . With the exception of brief periods under  Napoleon  from 1808 to 1815 and under the Roman Republics of  1798–99  and  1849 , the ghetto of Rome was controlled by the  papacy  until the  capture of Rome  in 1870. The ghetto was a walled quarter with its gates locked at night. The wall was built under the direction of the architect  Giovanni Sallustio Peruzzi . The cost of the wall's construction, 300  Roman scudi , had to be paid by the Jewish community. The area of Rome chosen for the...