Skip to main content

The Gay Icon in St. Agnes' Church


In the Church of St. Agnes is a gay icon; do they know?

Just inside the main doors on the altar to the left is a statue of St. Sebastian. Posed with a hand behind his head and the other on his thigh, the sculpture accentuates his youthful buff-good-looks but also emphasizes the arrows which pierce his taut body. His facial expression seems slightly odd however. With eyes looking upward to the sky questioningly his slightly open mouth seems to be saying: "who, me?"

Perhaps that is the nature of martyrdom: "who, me?"

St. Sebastian is a gay icon. Dating back to at least the 19th century his image has taken on a cult like status within the gay community. The homoerotic quality of the composition coupled with his tortured predicament has resonated deeply within gay culture and identity: https://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/stories/lgbt-artwork-marks-saint-sebastian-feast-day

On the same altar and just to the left of St. Sebastian's sculpture is the figure of the broken body of Jesus, surmounted by the cross draped with white cloth (representing his resurrection?). His body echoes the masculinity of St. Sebastian, with muscles this time pierced by cuts representing his brutal treatment and crucifixion. The facial expression of Jesus appears to be one of peace.

Both sculptures' meanings ricochet off each other, and their close proximity implies an intentionality. These works were place together because of an intertwined meaning or shared purpose.

Being Jewish I would never feel comfortable trying to expound on the Christian meaning or interplay of both, but being gay I would like to give it a go and suggest there is queer subtext happening here. I situate this queer subtext in an issue I raised during Prof. Hollander's lecture on Interreligious Dialogue, specifically when 'the Other' returns the gaze and begins asking questions of those seeking dialogue.

As 'secular Jewish gay other', I read this composition in a different way than many of the Christian faithful, but a reading I feel warrants investigation. I respectfully suggest the interplay of St. Sebastian and Jesus points to contemporary notions of bodily autonomy, where we are all freely empowered to make decisions about our own body. 

So just as Jesus made a decision which the Christian tradition teaches leads to salvation, so too (in the form of a homoerotic St. Sebastian gay icon) do I claim the same right of ownership of my body and right to make choices for myself. In terms of dialogue this could raise interesting opportunities to talk about common suffering and shared stories of survival. It could provide a foundation of trust where deep bonds of friendship could be formed.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Messengers: Prophets, Martyrs, Saints and Us - and Palm Trees

  Reflecting on Messengers as the Sun Sets Yesterday's lecture about Islam provoked me to think deeply on the idea of messenger. We often hear the phrase, "don't shoot the messenger" and may even use it ourselves. Sometimes we don't want to hear the message. It may be inconvenient, controversial or contrary to our own understanding. It can challenge and provoke us and be unsettling. We do have a choice, and can act or not act according to the message.  I found myself reacting to the teaching from Islam that describes the Prophet as the last messenger, but after considering the course in its entirety - many faiths believe different things about their messengers. In Christianity we do not agree on many of the qualities that define prophets, martyrs and saints. As those participating in faith, we are all messengers. How we are remembered as those messengers is more about those that follow after our time.  Persons of Faith 'Remembered' in Bronze Our Tour of th...

Walking on Holy Land

Basilica di Santa Clemente (Matteo Carboni) The other day I visited Basilica Di Santa Clemente al Laterano. Santa Clemente is an 11th century church built on top of a 4th century church named after St. Clement of Rome who was the Pope between 88 and 99 CE. It is likely that the site had been used as a house church since the 2nd century CE, then transformed into a large church complex in the 4th century. Beside the 4th century church there was a temple of Mithras that had been used since the 2nd century CE. Underneath the church and the temple, excavators found Roman households destroyed by the fire of Nero in 64 CE.  I think Santa Clemente is one of the coolest sites I have visited in Rome. It has been a neighborhood church for nearly 2000 years and has only needed one upgrade!  The physical relationship between the two churches has given me much to ponder. The foundations of the 4th century church was used as a blueprint for the 11th century church. One the one hand, this is ...

18 Synagogues, all Orthodox, is Unsettling

Visiting the Great Synagogue of Rome was unsettling.  It's a beautiful building with a fascinating history, which amazingly survived both Fascist Mussolini and Nazi occupation remaining intact for 120 years. The building's interior is unlike any other synagogue I've seen before, with its fantastic museum and centuries old collection of Judaica (including textiles) only contributing to its beauty and spiritual significance. There's also a small Sephardic Synagogue located in the basement, roped off, where only Jews are permitted access (according to another group's guide). I was unsettled. During the building tour our group was brought up to men's section of the main synagogue, where Maureen asked a wonderful question about tradition practiced in the synagogue and was told they were Orthodox, and neither Ashkenazi nor Sephardic (even though there was a Sephardic Temple in the basement) but practice their own historic rite. A further question followed about other ...